Page 1 of 1

Threat Numbers in action

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 11:13 pm
by Stormfalcon
Just got the full PDA version and glancing through it right now (tried printing it out, but my printer chose to start screwing up). So far, it's looking good, and I like the amount of examples used in the book. However, I think that one more should've been put in, and that's illustrating how to generate an NPC's Threat Number. I know from page 102 that it's highest DT + highest defense roll + highest attack roll + bonuses & penaties to health & endurance. With the rolls, is it a case where it's the number of dice, or is it a case where you take the number of dice and multiply by six (the highest roll on a d6), and can we get an example of just how to generate a TN?

Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2005 7:35 am
by Clay
For TV calculation, it is always the number of DICE rolled. Using such numbers times 6 would, for one, be much higher than the example TVs and, for two, not be accurate, since a roll of all 6s becomes increasingly unlikely as the number of dice go up.

I apologize for it not being clear, though. I hope this answers your question? ^^

For an example, since the NPCs are already done, let me give one of the PCs a stab, let's say....Karis.

Karis's strongest means of attack is her boomerang, which has a DT of 4.

Karis's Quick +2 and Defense +2 offer a max defense roll of 6.

Karis's Agile +1 and Combat Skill +2 give her an attack roll of 5

She has no Abilities or Weaknesses that affect Health and Endurance.

The result is 4 + 6 + 5, or 15.

Of course there's some fluctuating room here. Barrier allows, theoretically, a higher Defense Roll. In the case of Shadowman, he was given a point or two extra TV to cover this. In Karis's case, the Ability is low-ranked enough I don't think it is worth much, if anything.

Of bigger note is her Servant, Arasuni. If he is present in the encounter, I would also calculate HIS TV.

DT = 5, Defense = 1, Attack = 4, and Tough = +3

So 13. GM's may also grant a point or two because of his Armor Ability.

Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2005 5:55 pm
by Stormfalcon
Thanks! This makes things a lot more clear. Perhaps this clarification should go into the version destined for Print on Demand?